This week’s Tiki Tiki finds Leticia Reyes bothered about an incident involving a member of the media showing his/her disdain for the most recent album by the group RBD by stomping on their CD on air.  Leticia posed the question whether or not this WAS freedom of speech or unnecessary, disrespectful to the artist and a “destruction of the performer’s artistic endeavor”.  I have to side with J.I. Starr, ONLY because it was destruction of a CD and not an actual piece of art… which would and should bring consequences.  It’s different when it’s a flag being stomped on, but me personally, I would have just disposed of said CD.

Should being in the media, and “supposedly” representing a non-biased point of view, been addressed in this case?  Should there have been repercussions for this member of the media?

As much as I despise many  ignorant and prejudiced radio or TV hosts, I hate to admit, but they represent SOMEONE’s point of view no matter how moronic or how much we disagree.  Our Constitution  allows us ALL the right to be asses.

There’s also mention of Luis  Miguel on the cover of People en Espanol and finally, big ups to the “Norhlins” Saints who fought hard and earned their Superbowl win.

I wonder how that member of the media would feel if the group RBD found a way to get one of the “Norhlins” Saints to stomp on his/her microphone and camera?